The NDIS and compensation

15th Mar 2018


The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is a no-fault disability insurance scheme that will be rolled out across Australia by the end of 2019. It is managed by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA).

Being eligible for lump sum compensation or benefits via an existing statutory insurance scheme does not prevent someone from accessing the NDIS. However, these alternative sources of compensation will be taken into account by the NDIA in assessing eligibility for the NDIS, with funding reduced accordingly so as to prevent people effectively being compensated twice for the same injury.



There will obviously be some overlap between the NDIS and existing workplace and motor vehicle injury insurance schemes (referred to as ‘alternative schemes’ hereafter).

While there is no clear legal requirement for a potential NDIS participant to first access alternative schemes if eligible, the NDIS hypothetically has the power to direct them to do so. 

Potential eligibility for an alternative scheme does not prevent someone from also applying for the NDIS, which can provide supports while eligibility for the alternative scheme is determined. 

Once someone has been accepted into an alternative scheme, any funding and support already received will be taken into account by the NDIA. As a general rule, the funding for reasonable and necessary supports from the NDIS will be reduced by an amount equivalent to the value of the funding for similar supports received under the alternative scheme. 

Whether the NDIS will provide additional funding in these circumstances depends largely on the types of care and supports funded by the alternative scheme. However, if a particular support is not funded by the alternative scheme but meets the NDIS criteria, then hypothetically it should be funded by the NDIS.

Where the NDIS provides funding to someone later deemed to be eligible for an alternative scheme, the NDIA may recover the cost of these directly from the alternative scheme. It is not recovered from the injured person.


Repayment of past NDIS supports

The NDIS is entitled to be repaid if a participant recovers compensation for the type of care and supports that the NDIS has already been funding.

In some circumstances, the NDIA can recover the amount directly from the defendant or their insurer through the issue of a Preliminary Notice. That party must then inform the NDIA once they become liable to pay compensation and make the repayment before releasing the compensation to the injured person.

Otherwise, the participant will be responsible for the past repayment, so this amount must be included in the lump sum compensation claim.

Advice as to the repayment required can be obtained from the NDIA.

Reductions in future NDIS funding

The NDIA is entitled to reduce funding in any future NDIS plan in recognition of the fact that the participant has already received compensation for that injury from another source. 

To assess the reduction, the NDIA will calculate the Compensation Recovery Amount (CRA). The calculation method will be different depending on which of the following applies: 

1.    participant receives compensation by judgment or settlement that either fixes the NDIS component, or the NDIS component is ‘objectively identifiable’; or

2.    participant receives compensation by judgment or settlement and the NDIS component is not objectively identifiable (s3.1(b) Rules ).

The ‘NDIS component’ is the amount of compensation awarded for care and support items that the NDIS funds.

Scenario 1 – NDIS component specified or can be objectively identified

To work out the CRA, the NDIS component is identified and amounts paid by the participant for past support are deducted. The final figure is the CRA and this cannot be less than nil.

We understand that this approach will be used only when the court has fixed an award for damages for care and support in a non-consent judgment, or where the participant is transferring benefits from an existing insurance scheme into a lump sum.

This method will not apply to any settlement by consent, regardless of the terms of the release or other supporting documentation. It will also not apply to court approval of a compromise. 

Scenario 2 – NDIS component not specified or objectively identified

This will apply to all other settlements.

Calculation steps:

1.    Calculate the amount of compensation under settlement;

  • Compensation refers to the gross amount of compensation, including any legal costs, either agreed or from ‘all in’ settlement.
  • Costs should not be taken into account if they were already taken into account for the purpose of calculating a Centrelink preclusion period (that is, due to an ‘all in’ settlement or agreed costs).

2.    Subtract repayments (Medicare and Centrelink);

  • Medicare and Centrelink are currently the only repayments taken into account.
  • Any other repayment (private health insurers, equipment providers, legal costs, etc) will not be taken into account.

3.    Subtract amount that reflects the value of any preclusion under Centrelink or other relevant benefit;

  • If no preclusion period has arisen and the participant made a claim for loss of income, then 50% of compensation is subtracted.
  • In rare cases where Centrelink has used a different amount, that amount will be used.
  • It is unclear how this will apply if the Centrelink preclusion period has already expired at the time of settlement.

4.    Calculate the amount that the NDIS would have paid had the person been a participant from the time of the compensable event. If the remainder is greater than this amount, replace the remainder with that figure (that is, the lesser figure);

  • The value of the hypothetical NDIS supports will obviously be very difficult for participants and their legal representatives to work out.

5.    Subtract cost of past supports paid by participant;

  • The value of past gratuitous attendant care will not be taken into account.
  • The value of past commercial care will not be taken into account if it was for care that the family could otherwise reasonably have been expected to provide.

6.    Subtract any amounts repayable to NDIS for past support; and

7.    Subtract value of any reduction in previous plans due to compensation being received.

The remainder is the CRA. It will be re-calculated each year.

Applying the CRA

The CRA will be amortised over a period no longer than the remainder of the participant’s expected lifetime. In other words, the remainder is divided by the number of years of life expectancy. The NDIS-funded care and support package will be reduced by that amount each year.

The total value of the participant’s plan will still be calculated without reference to the CRA. However, the NDIS will provide funding only up to the point where the yearly CRA applies, and the participant will be expected to fund the remainder of the plan. Experience suggests that if the participant does not fund the remainder of the plan, they risk losing approval for those supports in the next plan on the basis that they were not required. The result will be that the new plan will be smaller but the CRA will still apply.

The NDIA actuaries assess life expectancy using the Australian Life tables and the ‘Care and Needs Scale’. 

Because of uncertainty around a number of steps in the calculation process and the NDIA-assessed life expectancy, it will be extremely difficult for participants and their legal representatives to accurately calculate the CRA themselves. Instead, advice should be sought from the NDIA.


The definition of compensation in the Act excludes lump sums paid from insurance policies.


If the participant has agreed to give up compensation for care and support, the NDIA is still entitled to calculate a hypothetical CRA and reduce funding in the normal way. This is presumably designed to prevent people giving up those rights in order to protect their NDIS entitlements.


The NDIA can direct a participant or prospective participant to take action to claim compensation for personal injury if the NDIA believes that the person has an entitlement and has not taken reasonable action to make a claim. However, the NDIA can do so only if it believes that the person has ‘reasonable prospects’ of success.

If someone fails to comply with the direction from the NDIA, their NDIS funding can be suspended. The NDIA also has the power to take over existing claims or pursue new claims on behalf of participants. If this power is used, the NDIA becomes liable for all legal costs.


Under s3.10 of the Rules, the CEO can agree to waive or reduce the repayment or CRA due to the ‘special circumstances’ of the case. There is no guidance on what might constitute special circumstances but the NDIA has indicated that this will generally be limited to hardship.


Where the compensation received by a participant has been reduced because of contributory negligence, the CRA is reduced by the same proportion as applied in reducing the size of the award.


1800 800 110


National Disability Insurance Agency
GPO Box 700
Canberra ACT 2601


Tom Ballantyne is a Principal in Maurice Blackburn’s medical negligence department. He is a Law Institute of Victoria Personal Injury Accredited Specialist, is listed in the prestigious Doyle’s guide, and is the Victorian President of the Australian Lawyers Alliance. He is also responsible for preparing Maurice Blackburn and its clients for the NDIS and has presented on this topic at the ALA National Conference and health, disability and community groups around the country.

The views and opinions expressed in these articles are the authors' and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA).

Learn about how you can get involved and contribute an article. 

Tags: Compensation Disability NDIS Insurance NDIA